@TeacherToolkit
Ross Morrison McGill founded @TeacherToolkit in 2007, and today, he is one of the ‘most followed educators’on social media in the world. In 2015, he was nominated as one of the ‘500 Most Influential People in Britain’ by The Sunday Times as a result of…
Read more about @TeacherToolkit
Is Ofsted helping or hindering school improvement?
This new research sheds light on what Ofsted eleven former inspectors really think of the current inspection process.
In “Ofsted from Within: Inspectors’ Views on Challenges and Future Direction” (Tian and Diamond, 2024), many inspectors suggest the system has grown too focused on performative compliance rather than supporting schools in their growth.
Former HMI inspectors call for a more balanced system, one that genuinely supports improvement and collaboration rather than compliance. They argue for an inspection process that better balances accountability with a collaborative approach, so schools can focus on teaching and learning, rather than tick boxes.
The research argues that “many inspectors, acting as OfSTED’s messengers, are constrained by the prescriptive inspection framework.”
What do inspectors think?
Many teachers know that Ofsted inspections bring intense scrutiny and often reshape how schools operate, but what do inspectors themselves think of these processes?
In this study, inspectors express concerns that current methods have become more about compliance and box-ticking than genuine improvement. Gaining insight into inspectors’ perspectives is crucial because they are key actors in the inspection process and shape how schools and teachers feel about accountability.
The study highlights that, as the inspection culture has shifted towards a performative approach, many schools now operate defensively, prioritising what looks good on paper over real development.
What do inspectors say?
I have pulled out some quotes from inspectors on a range of topics. Here is what they say:
- OfSTED appeared to set up its own research machine. And then select what supported the Chief Inspector’s arguments.
- The difference between the predecessor framework and the 2019 framework was that OfSTED began to have a preferred style in certain areas.
- We’ve got examples of inspectors going into special schools and saying, ‘why aren’t they achieving in the phonics check?’. Well, because they’re nonverbal!
- And I know schools have dropped vocational courses because of this target to get more pupils doing E-Bacc. All the arts and creative subjects were seen as second-class subjects!
- Cognitive science and the sequencing of curriculum. And I think it (EIF) genuinely has lost sight of children.
Credit: Tian and Diamond, 2024
Reflection questions for teachers to consider
- How often does the inspection process in your school feel supportive rather than performative?
- What are the biggest challenges your school faces in meeting Ofsted standards?
- Do inspectors fully understand your school’s unique context during evaluations?
- How can you empower staff to highlight the school’s strengths to inspectors?
- What steps could Ofsted take to support your school’s goals more effectively?
- What can leaders do to encourage a positive culture around inspections?
- How does your school implement areas for improvement after inspections?
- Could peer reviews help prepare for or alleviate inspection pressures?
- What benefits might a more open dialogue with inspectors bring?
- Could inspection stress be affecting student and teacher performance? How can this be addressed?
In the research, there is one comment which stands out for me:
Anything can move on, but single-word judgements have to be tackled first. The link now between inspection grades and quite crude measures about what happens to schools is getting in the way of the whole purpose of inspection.
Download the full paper to learn more about these findings.